Thank you Jenna!

Unrelated comment because I don’t have your email address, Angelique, and I don’t think it’s necessary to make a whole blog post:

Here’s a friend’s tweet about CUNY Wikipedia editing: […]

Hi Carolyn, I’m not quite sure what you would consider unique technologies, but it makes sense to work to enhance DH. So I would probably agree that PowerPoints and business oriented software would definitely […]

Hi Jeff, thank you for this provocation. I’m enjoying the readings in “Debates in the Digital Humanities” and am adopting it as my tome for understanding all things “DH” better. I like the themes of “embracing […]

Hi Angelique, thank you for this provocation and great summary of Fitzpatrick. I like how you pose the open-ended question “does such process of cherry-picking one’s reviewers really stand for open peer review?” a […]

Kyueun, this is a good question. It is question of both etiquette and ethics. The key question, I think, is whether the email can be considered “published” material. Which is to say, is it meant for a “public.” […]

Hi Christina, you made some great points. Mainly your reference to universal software and a “one size fits all,” theory. I believe that a software that covers the general needs of pedagogy would be great. But […]

As Carolyn also pointed out, I’m also curious about your question on “one size fits all” software of ePortfolio. Before talking about the practicality/possibility of making the software, I want to ask about “the […]

Yes, you should, as a courtesy, let your person know you plan to quote their email communication.

Thanks a lot for your answer. I guess my main question was not clear in the writing, but I was wondering more about the “permission to cite” persoal communications (if it’s solely through a person-to-person […]

Hi Christina, fun title! Thanks for this provocation, I like the way you raise the questions of ” if there is a universal software that can be made that is a ‘one size fits all’ across education […]