I agree with the statement that we should have more sessions to further discuss these important issues. A couple of takeaways for me was the statement of “establishing trust “, without that, the level of sharing a […]

@GCTLC.

Thank you!

?Forget it, I get it now. You were referencing the meme. Sorry!

Sadly, this email notification was due to a bug (one we’re working to fix)
— the original blog post is from 2009 (!!!), and it has been more than a
year since we’ve eaten pizza together!!! Here’s hoping the day […]

I definitely wish I had seen this message before submitting.

_______________________________________

Professor Hossannah Asuncion (she/her/hers)

[email protected]

(Text) […]

I had today my first encounter with Python (I went to the workshop). I love it, I think it is the beginning of a beautiful friendship between Python and me.

Shani,

It does not matter the class and race of […]

Hi Greet,

We don’t have plans to do this, but would be happy to share the agenda and materials for the workshop after it runs.

Best,
Luke

Hi Greet,

We don’t have plans to do this, but would be happy to share the agenda and materials for the workshop after it runs.

Best,
Luke

Thank you Jenna!

Unrelated comment because I don’t have your email address, Angelique, and I don’t think it’s necessary to make a whole blog post:

Here’s a friend’s tweet about CUNY Wikipedia editing: […]

Hi Carolyn, I’m not quite sure what you would consider unique technologies, but it makes sense to work to enhance DH. So I would probably agree that PowerPoints and business oriented software would definitely […]

Hi Jeff, thank you for this provocation. I’m enjoying the readings in “Debates in the Digital Humanities” and am adopting it as my tome for understanding all things “DH” better. I like the themes of “embracing […]

Hi Angelique, thank you for this provocation and great summary of Fitzpatrick. I like how you pose the open-ended question “does such process of cherry-picking one’s reviewers really stand for open peer review?” a […]

Kyueun, this is a good question. It is question of both etiquette and ethics. The key question, I think, is whether the email can be considered “published” material. Which is to say, is it meant for a “public.” […]

Hi Christina, you made some great points. Mainly your reference to universal software and a “one size fits all,” theory. I believe that a software that covers the general needs of pedagogy would be great. But […]

As Carolyn also pointed out, I’m also curious about your question on “one size fits all” software of ePortfolio. Before talking about the practicality/possibility of making the software, I want to ask about “the […]

Yes, you should, as a courtesy, let your person know you plan to quote their email communication.

Thanks a lot for your answer. I guess my main question was not clear in the writing, but I was wondering more about the “permission to cite” persoal communications (if it’s solely through a person-to-person […]

Hi Christina, fun title! Thanks for this provocation, I like the way you raise the questions of ” if there is a universal software that can be made that is a ‘one size fits all’ across education […]

Good question, Kyueun. I use Chicago 16 as my style authority and use their Note/Bibliography format. Here’s what they say about how to write a citation for any personal communication (substitute “email message” […]