Public Group active 1 month, 4 weeks ago

American Cultural Voices, 1620-1865 ENG 75100; ASCP 81500

This course covers a representative range of American writings of the 1620-1865 period, from seventeenth-century Puritan prose and poetry to the eighteenth-century literature of enlightenment, revolution, and national founding, and on to that unique moment of political tension and cultural flowering, the Civil War era. We explore Puritan works by William Bradford and Jonathan Edwards; texts of the American Enlightenment by Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson; the poetry of Anne Bradstreet, Walt Whitman, and Emily Dickinson; nonfiction by Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and Abraham Lincoln; fiction by Edgar Allan Poe, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and Herman Melville; the writings of African Americans, including David Walker, Frederick Douglass, and Harriet Jacobs; and Native American works such as the Winnebago trickster cycle and Iroquois creation story. In addition to reading landmark works of America’s formative period, we discuss current approaches to cultural history, American Studies, and such critical approaches as historicist, queer, circumatlantic, ecocritical, and aesthetic/formalist. Class meetings are on Zoom. Assignments include a book review and a term paper.

Admins:

  • My Oral Testimony at the Maryland House Finance Committee 3/27/2024

    Hi Everyone,

    Professor Reynolds I hope this post reflects how much my work has already benefited from your class, just halfway through. I thought you all might find this interesting. I, of course, am obsessed.

    Here is my oral testimony that I did not get to finish as I was booted out of the zoom call. The 21st Rule is likely in effect in Maryland. The Maryland House Finance Committee that cut me off a little over two minutes saying it was unfair I go on while I was quoting Garrison saying he will be heard. . . I got most of it in. Two minutes to establish anything that will impact all people in Maryland unless ever repealed is outrageous.  I also will include the link to my published written testimony. HB 1019 is the psychiatric emergency evaluation bill that adds the rights of law enforcement to use force against those they are petitioned to capture.

    TESTIMONY OF LAUREN J. TENNEY, PhD, MPhil, MPA, BPS, Psychiatric Survivor

    UNFAVORABLE HB1019 Petitions for Emergency Evaluation

    My name is Lauren Joy Tenney. I am a research psychologist and psychiatric survivor. My written testimony has been submitted. I request you give an UNFAVORABLE RESPONSE to HB1019.

    The use of force by law enforcement poses serious risks including more people being killed by the police. In general, any court ordered psychiatric involvement presents ethical, legal, and practical concerns. Justice should not be based on guesswork and people with legal expertise do not have the training or licensure to make psychiatric assessment. Further, the absence of clear criteria for extension raises concerns about arbitrary decisions and human rights violations. Additionally, extending emergency evaluations up to 30 days lacks clarity and invalidates the idea of ‘emergency’ as an urgent matter, if ongoing for up to 30 days.

    The gross over representation of People of Color in court ordered, coerced, and highly surveilled psychiatry in Maryland exists across the public psychiatric system.

    HB1019 is leading to a system of psychiatric parole.

    I am hopeful no such similarity of the 21st Rule of 1836 -1844 – the Gag Rule – banning discussions and petitions for the abolition of slavery in the legislative body is not in effect here in Maryland in 2024. The Missouri Compromise of 1850 created the role of a “Commissioner” who could designate people to catch those who were enslaved, who absconded, successfully escaped, and then were found to be returned. Of course, with the 13th Amendment this was etched into our US Constitution as slavery as a legalized form of punishment, ordinarily thought of as carried out in prison, lest we forget prison psychiatry.

    Some may think my words and analysis is grounded in words too harsh and will backfire against progress of making a kinder, gentler form of modern legalized slavery, but as abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison said introducing The Liberator in 1831, “I am aware, that many object to the severity of my language; but is there not cause for severity? I will be as harsh as truth, and as compromising as justice. On this subject, I do not wish to think, or speak, or write, with moderation. No! No! Tell a man whose house is on fire, to give a moderate alarm . . .; –but urge me not to equivocate—I will not excuse—I will not retreat a single inch—AND I WILL BE HEARD.”

    Of course, Harry Belafonte reported that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. told him just days before he was assassinated in April 1968, “I am afraid that we are integrating into a burning house.”

    Coercive psychiatric interventions perpetuate harm and injustice, are based on a deceptive psychiatry narrative that is enacted with gross racial disparities, with no accountability or clear data collection on its consequences, including known iatrogenic effects, including a shortened life span and death.

    Most concerning is the clear potential that legislating use of force by law enforcement to capture those who have broken their psychiatric parole will lead to more violence and deaths, that will be the responsibility of the legislature that approved the use of force – that can lead to deadly force and the unnecessary loss of life. The financial toll will be outrageous. The loss of life and humanity, unremunerative.

     

    So that was my testimony  – Garrison still getting cut off. Maybe if he gave more credence to John Brown . . .  Looking forward to class on Tuesday! – Lauren

    https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/cmte_testimony/2024/fin/1p53c9Kzy9YtPTFzmV9H1AUU2F6dGeD8C.pdf

     

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.