https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/members/kuszai/activity/friends/ Activity feed for Joel Kuszai's friends. Sat, 01 Jan 2050 18:00:18 -0500 https://buddypress.org/?v= en 30 hourly 2 70c932de547328088e4f62119bc355bf https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1160167/ Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:41:21 -0400 463dc7b1a05482c240c49d8986e0e392 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1155073/ Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:24:39 -0400 946f3c59954c40c01e5ac895a46e3fa9 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1153471/ Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:09:29 -0400 105adbacf0d538efbd8ed60a905dd553 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1143091/ Sat, 07 Feb 2026 16:16:47 -0500 eef988825a2c9ed13eb9607b38002a46 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1142263/ Thu, 05 Feb 2026 13:31:51 -0500 517efbaf568240e3ce37469882ab4f34 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1132383/ Fri, 19 Dec 2025 20:13:54 -0500 6c9120d37d721099d28f8f6e6cbd52f3 https://cadhe.commons.gc.cuny.edu/?p=331 Mon, 24 Nov 2025 13:58:05 -0500 Concerns over Title VI Training: Academic Freedom and Freedom of ExpressionTO:  Interim EVC and University Provost Alvero FROM:  CUNY Alliance to Defend Higher Education (CADHE) CC:  Chancellor Matos Rodriguez, Board Chair Thompson, General Counsel Davis, UFS Chair Verzani, PSC Chair Davis, CUNY Presidents, CADHE Organizing Committee RE:  Concerns over Title VI Training: Academic Freedom and Freedom of Expression November 24, 2025 Dear Interim EVC and University Provost Alvero, The CUNY Alliance to Defend Higher Education (CADHE) writes to you today to express our alarm at how academic freedom and free speech are represented in the recently mandated Title VI training announced to the university community on 11/14/25. We agree that it is essential that all members of the CUNY community be aware of the protections of Title VI, as well as the university’s responsibility to support those protections. But this training does not simply affirm the purposes of Title VI and provide guidance on how to enact its principles. Rather, it sends mixed messages to faculty by asserting that we have rights under academic freedom and the First Amendment while simultaneously warning us to restrain the exercise of those rights lest our actions be perceived as potential violations of Title VI. Below are the concerning points raised in the training that we would like to see addressed and revised: The training uses vague and potentially chilling language, repeating the phrase “hostile environment” without ever defining it, equating a student’s feeling of alienation in a classroom (also undefined) with discrimination, and conflating a perception of discriminatory behavior with actions that could legitimately qualify as violations of Title VI. This chilling effect extends to the discussion of the legal basis for academic and First Amendment freedoms: the presenter in the training describes in detail the Supreme Court decision in Garcetti vs. Ceballos, which limits free expression by government employees, and then points out that many courts, including those in New York, in addition to Heim vs. Daniel, have exempted higher education from these limitations. If Garcetti is irrelevant for CUNY’s purposes, why mention it at all beyond the desire to seed fears of punishment for speech inside and outside the classroom? Rather than leading our students towards meaningful and contextual thinking, the training encourages faculty to provide “counterpoints or other perspectives to balance discourse.” While many issues do generate equally legitimate opposing arguments and include a diversity of perspectives, this guidance is at best tone-deaf in relation to the fields in which many of us work: the history of slavery, for example, or climate science, public health, gender and sexuality studies, and the like. It is our responsibility as instructors not just to hear our students’ claims but to correct their mistakes and misapprehensions. Moreover, the definition of “controversial” is historically and geopolitically specific: questions that are heavily contested at one moment become conventional wisdom at another, and vice versa. Faculty expertise, not student enthusiasm, provides that context. Even more worrying is the training’s guidance around political activity on and off campus. The training notes that faculty are free to attend off campus protests, but we should be “mindful” of how our actions outside the classroom may lead to the perception of a hostile learning environment by students who disagree with a faculty member’s political positions. The training also notes that faculty may exercise their First Amendment rights by posting on social media, but that students are free to track down their posts and report them. Moreover, although the university would have no grounds on which to legally act against the faculty member, CUNY reserves the right, according to the training, to impose other “remedial measures.” In other words, student objections to faculty political speech could lead to discipline even though that speech is fully covered by both academic freedom and the First Amendment. Throughout the training, the threat of disciplinary action against faculty is repeatedly raised, although, again, with few specifics. Faculty are warned that in response to any number of different complaints of a hostile environment, “the university may need to take action.” Again, besides the fact that “hostile environment” is not defined, the phrase “may need to take action” is intimidatingly vague. Even more concerning is the assertion that such actions may include “academic adjustments.” Adjustment to a lesson plan? A syllabus? A faculty member’s teaching schedule or employment status? None of this is spelled out. Finally, we are troubled by one of the “Knowledge Check” questions after the training, which asks what is the appropriate action to take if one feels someone may be violating Title VI. While possible answers include “speaking with their supervisor” or “reaching out to Human Resources,” the “correct” response is to report this possible violation through the CUNY complaint portal. In other words, rather than first attempting to resolve an issue on the ground with department chairs, supervisors, or HR, faculty and staff, and students, should instead outsource potential complaints to CUNY central. Given the messages conveyed by this training, we have serious doubts about the wisdom of this advice. Additionally, by sending all complaints through the portal, and then to campus chief diversity officers (CDOs), the university violates its own Policy 5.20 of the Manual of General Policy, which explicitly lays out how student complaints of faculty are to be addressed, and simultaneously provides due process for all parties involved, includes an appeals process, and privileges the protection of academic freedom in such proceedings. The university’s Title VI training, which is not policy, ignores and upends the very principles of academic freedom and due process that Policy 5.20 lays out. In sum, we find that the net effect of this training is to induce faculty — most especially junior and adjunct faculty, who are the least protected — to self-censor in the classroom and abandon any First Amendment rights. If we engage in social media discourse or public protests, correct misinformation in our students, challenge their beliefs, or speak out of turn in any way, we can expect to be reported, either on the university’s portal or to our local CDOs, with claims that we have violated Title VI or at least created the perception of discrimination or of a hostile learning environment. As you know, many of these questions around academic freedom and freedom of expression were first raised in our response to a statement you issued in a 9/26/25 newsletter from the Office of Academic Affairs. Several groups, including CADHE, the PSC and BMCC academic freedom committees, and most recently participants at the 10/28/25 UFS Plenary meeting, questioned the implications of that statement. At that meeting, you noted that your statement was received in a far different and more negative manner than you had anticipated, that you were not establishing policy in that statement, and that you planned to clarify the university’s position. However, within two weeks of this discussion, this mandatory Title VI training, which not only uses the same language of your statement of 9/26/25 but expands and amplifies the very assertions that CADHE and others objected to, appeared on our Brightspace pages, as though none of these objections had ever been made. Ultimately, this training does far more damage than good. It places the onus for student comfort (characterized here as a “safe” environment) on faculty; it creates the impression that students are free to lodge complaints against protected faculty activities and leaves the faculty vulnerable to an untold number of attacks; and rather than generating an atmosphere of support for and confidence in faculty as guardians of student learning, it implies that the university’s job is to restrain our political speech, surveille our classrooms, and eradicate any hint of student dissatisfaction. We reiterate our request that you issue a clarification of your and the university’s position with regard to faculty’s academic freedom and First Amendment rights, which this Title VI training explicitly undermines. We further reiterate our request that you consult with the Academic Freedom Committee of the UFS, and any other academic freedom committees you deem fit, who could have pointed out any of the above concerns before your 9/26/25 statement on academic freedom and this Title VI training were released — thus avoiding the unnecessary fear and anxiety that has been caused amongst the faculty. CADHE Organizing Committee Cristina Bruns, LaGuardia Community College Sarah E. Chinn, Hunter College Jonathan Cornick, Queensborough Community College Beth Evans, Brooklyn College Paul Fess, LaGuardia Community CollegeJean Halley, College of Staten IslandErnest Ialongo, Hostos Community CollegeKaren Kaplowitz, John Jay College of Criminal Justice Joel Kuszai, Queensborough Community College Douglas A. Medina, Guttman Community College Hillary Miller, Queens College Mojubaolu Olufunke Okome, Brooklyn College Philip A. Pecorino, Queensborough Community College Larissa Swedell, Queens College Emily Sohmer Tai, Queensborough Community College Karen Weingarten, QueRead more“Concerns over Title VI Training: Academic Freedom and Freedom of Expression”

]]> d78d4adf5cd77b0894cc839350fa10d1 https://cadhe.commons.gc.cuny.edu/?p=327 Wed, 19 Nov 2025 21:00:23 -0500 CUNY Statements and Resolutions rejecting the McMahon/Mailman Compact

]]> afe225fda6719870c14babe5cb9c33b0 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1114155/ Fri, 31 Oct 2025 01:42:18 -0400 f442fdaf1513f101fae818c6f8d780cb https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1113371/ Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:31:13 -0400 3b781496a4187bb26bbb317061a16b03 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1112679/ Fri, 24 Oct 2025 17:08:11 -0400 c11b70cbad8cdbd91adabb4df9599c2f https://cadhe.commons.gc.cuny.edu/?p=315 Thu, 16 Oct 2025 13:20:42 -0400 Academic Freedom at CUNY: The Latest ChallengeSent to: CUNY Chancellor Matos Rodriguez CUNY Interim Provost Alvero CUNY BOT Chairperson Thompson Copied to: CUNY UFS, SUNY UFS, PSC-CUNY, AAUP Academic Freedom at CUNY_ The Latest Challenge 10.16.25Download

]]> 8bffbbb01b92ee91d59a5ff11f186e10 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1108239/ Fri, 10 Oct 2025 12:38:20 -0400 ae722037b5fe727b2a0419888a08cbbd https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1108125/ Thu, 09 Oct 2025 23:34:13 -0400 c15e689ab3f13c26cececca2102aa75d https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1108007/ Thu, 09 Oct 2025 18:22:00 -0400 d2bc8d99a34de84e0ea6236cf0e50812 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1107959/ Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:47:26 -0400 45e63034e1d4470e7040de425a3abe3e https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1107949/ Thu, 09 Oct 2025 13:05:49 -0400 b1349da5b5c91cc41a0de46155eb9cc6 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1107657/ Wed, 08 Oct 2025 19:47:30 -0400 936d3d596f25701607da0436cce7935b https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1107141/ Wed, 08 Oct 2025 13:24:50 -0400 ae269ae4fdda0bdf3974344dc51e2f41 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1106789/ Mon, 06 Oct 2025 21:36:09 -0400 e23aae51b7131a1b81cdd3168b6d70c3 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1106445/ Mon, 06 Oct 2025 01:05:46 -0400 a220b3109d2621bea778d3fc450d132b https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1106247/ Sat, 04 Oct 2025 13:07:26 -0400 087d581c9dba1741a5eea7994afb2439 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1106019/ Thu, 02 Oct 2025 20:51:17 -0400 371ff528b93b0fead4a41baadba5c383 https://cadhe.commons.gc.cuny.edu/?p=305 Wed, 01 Oct 2025 22:33:34 -0400 Statement in Support of Texas Tech Faculty who teach about Gender, Sex, and SexualityTexas Tech University statementDownload

]]> 69afcc420934d7877e9879a817c2b2fc https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1104603/ Sat, 27 Sep 2025 00:32:26 -0400 67cd1cf72f2f6ea20ddc9bd1c948d979 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1103563/ Tue, 23 Sep 2025 15:25:17 -0400 6d9d70e93483ec218ecd819bcb101f94 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1102715/ Fri, 19 Sep 2025 13:30:36 -0400 842313172bfcc72b754fe0206cd637aa https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1091779/ Tue, 02 Sep 2025 15:59:47 -0400 60c2d1a85a15842d33cc8df5d4f4d4aa https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1089329/ Wed, 27 Aug 2025 22:21:13 -0400 5c7127a3c8deea30403f622608db444f https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1087611/ Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:52:38 -0400 7a261138c5524b45640b99a81a3a33cb https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1086877/ Mon, 11 Aug 2025 20:52:19 -0400 13bf6cb7b79f5e5f8137623ef0198e7c https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1081623/ Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:29:18 -0400 356ee5d98dbed55022d119bc599a1e9e https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1080999/ Mon, 09 Jun 2025 20:08:45 -0400 38ea284dceea3e36f5f2b6f14fd5f81d https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1078835/ Sun, 25 May 2025 04:23:14 -0400 a4f215172b6fd809e25a26fe54eb34b7 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1077895/ Fri, 23 May 2025 03:46:34 -0400 3266d9880200d002278ce63688f63e03 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1075721/ Mon, 19 May 2025 22:22:48 -0400 1273f3d15d74ac5df391fbb115113d0a https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1074811/ Sat, 17 May 2025 11:59:00 -0400 c43456c35a1a71e8420b2b98ff8ed907 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1064139/ Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:28:01 -0400 12b65ba1804b15de12fd4c842d044fa8 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1064133/ Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:05:57 -0400 09cd2783012ad46e68f4c5da3f9fd1e3 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1063947/ Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:58:42 -0400 9d6289e59357002984ad75beb47f770d https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1063665/ Sun, 20 Apr 2025 12:33:47 -0400 45e9c1b85102bafbbc300188be5c1c2a https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1063277/ Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:58:33 -0400 e895a0923ba8ae49ece930730c59bf0e https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1063137/ Tue, 15 Apr 2025 12:13:54 -0400 9397aac12d53bdf7be7cdc9a6a559d83 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1063043/ Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:24:58 -0400 d84e82567bd6a8009cacd990a44bf2b1 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1062989/ Sun, 13 Apr 2025 12:06:36 -0400 cdabacd065f611da5ac1670c74b07b6d https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1062585/ Thu, 10 Apr 2025 20:58:06 -0400 3a07eb7d25bdc8dfb44927aa9fb6d14c https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1062535/ Thu, 10 Apr 2025 18:48:50 -0400 c7e8e71aa0b99751937e14bbe9132a7d https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1062511/ Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:40:24 -0400 89c9c98e226432943bbd937a26a4bfb2 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1058829/ Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:12:34 -0400 d533a9fe77778730cebcec3a6b713122 https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/1058505/ Thu, 27 Mar 2025 15:25:59 -0400