<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CUNY Academic Commons | Jeffrey Vandervennet | Activity</title>
	<link>https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/members/jeffvand13/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/members/jeffvand13/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Jeffrey Vandervennet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2050 18:00:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ac4d076e9b9b30d1e135f71e54b471e8</guid>
				<title>Jeffrey Vandervennet commented on the post, Reading Discussion for October 7: Freedom and Unfreedom in the Lean Years, on the site United States Labor History</title>
				<link>https://uslaborhistory.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2020/10/01/reading-discussion-for-october-7-freedom-and-unfreedom-in-the-lean-years/#comment-119</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 18:32:35 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fligstein opens his essay by recognizing the importance of context when studying history.  People are products of their environments, and political and social conditions constrain actions. The author shows us the [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0b6e5c012a64ef4ee82e2870a31c9c74</guid>
				<title>Jeffrey Vandervennet commented on the post, Reading Discussion for September 30: Populism and Radicalism, on the site United States Labor History</title>
				<link>https://uslaborhistory.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2020/09/24/reading-discussion-for-september-30-populism-and-radicalism/#comment-104</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:07:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fink criticizes viewing the Gilded Age as a singular event, and not in context of broader American history.  Criticizes the opposite approach, that the similarities in results between contemporary labor-capital [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3668bdb4dc35b3fbdb354db8224c98e1</guid>
				<title>Jeffrey Vandervennet commented on the post, Reading Discussion for September 23: The Work of Conquest and Development, on the site United States Labor History</title>
				<link>https://uslaborhistory.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2020/09/16/reading-discussion-for-september-23-the-work-of-conquest-and-development/#comment-87</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:59:44 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciated Batzell’s scholarship about the Workingmen in California, enlightening me to a political struggle I had never learned about.  Their grievances included a wholesale critique of the rapid i [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9edf7bdca38b32d1e6a4e42431e20d45</guid>
				<title>Jeffrey Vandervennet commented on the post, Reading Discussion for September 16: Slavery and Freedom, on the site United States Labor History</title>
				<link>https://uslaborhistory.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2020/09/09/reading-discussion-for-september-16-slavery-and-freedom/#comment-65</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:53:16 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I was enthralled with DuBois’ writing. He effortlessly weaves historical sources and analysis, and does so with a refreshing clarity. Essentially, as Chris and Hollis have noted, he reframes civil war h [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ab5c32107a6561c8962f39059af270d5</guid>
				<title>Jeffrey Vandervennet commented on the post, Reading Discussion for September 9: Varieties of Non-Slave Labor, on the site United States Labor History</title>
				<link>https://uslaborhistory.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2020/09/02/reading-discussion-for-september-9-varieties-of-non-slave-labor/#comment-39</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:38:13 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share the head posters critiques that Chants Democratic is definitely not a comprehensive guide to the economy and society of pre-industrial New York City, but rather a glimpse into the specific window of the [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f7eeafde9fd69cde68090afaa8b15223</guid>
				<title>Jeffrey Vandervennet commented on the post, Reading Discussion September 2: Work and the Origins of American Capitalism, on the site United States Labor History</title>
				<link>https://uslaborhistory.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2020/09/01/reading-discussion-september-2-work-and-the-origins-of-american-capitalism/#comment-18</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:40:16 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this week’s reading, the central thesis has been the author’s search for the time period in which the American economy transitions from one which includes marketplaces to a full market economy, where all of our [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5fdc072f874739ed1bcf6229f18429a2</guid>
				<title>Jeffrey Vandervennet became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/activity/p/688277/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 19:08:14 -0400</pubDate>

				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>