LACUNY Scholarly Communications Roundtable

Group logo of LACUNY Scholarly Communications Roundtable

FTC Charges Academic Journal Publisher OMICS Group Deceived Researchers

This topic contains 9 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by 2 years, 7 months ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #49617

    Megan Wacha
    Participant

    “The Federal Trade Commission has charged the publisher of hundreds of purported online academic journals with deceiving academics and researchers about the nature of its publications and hiding publication fees ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars.”

    See the press release at: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2016/08/ftc-charges-academic-journal-publisher-omics-group-deceived

    #49660

    jean amaral
    Participant

    Thanks for posting the article about the OMICS charges, Megan. Two questions come to mind for me that I’d love to hear SCRTers responses to:
    ‚Äč

    • Should we (on our individual campuses) alert chairs and faculty generally to OMICs, using the opportunity to provide resources and consulting services on predatory publishing for faculty?
    • If we know faculty who have published in OMICS journals, should we let them know about the charges?

    At BMCC, I expect we’ll use this as an opportunity for outreach and education of chairs and faculty. We haven’t made a decision about contacting individual faculty who have published in the journals.

    What are you planning for your campus?

    Thanks in advance for any thoughts?

    #49663

    Beth Evans
    Participant

    Hi Jean,

    Definitely something to consider. How did you identify faculty authors who published in OMICS journals?

    The time does seem right to educate researchers, both as readers and writers, to be careful out in the world of scholarly communications. For example, we can promote the Think, Check, Submit web site and and any one of the Libguides created around CUNY that instruct on Author Rights and choosing a publisher (like Nancy Foasberg’s – http://qc-cuny.libguides.com/EvaluatePublisher).

    Concurrently, there is also a lot of discussion going on right now on how to educate researchers (as readers) about using SciHub. The University of Utah, as you may know, has developed a LibGuide on the topic:
    http://campusguides.lib.utah.edu/scihub

    A lot of messages to get out there about being careful.

    Beth

    #49666

    Monica Berger
    Participant

    Maybe we should work together on a one- or two page handout as well. I have one we could start with.

    #49690

    Madeline Cohen
    Participant

    Lehman has a Research Guide that has a recording of a workshop by Monica and Megan, as well as handouts:
    http://libguides.lehman.edu/selecting_quality_journals_faculty

    Maybe someone would volunteer to put all these great resources on a LibGuide here?:
    http://guides.cuny.edu/

    We could offer it to CUNY Libraries as well as Teaching and Learning Commons: https://commons.gc.cuny.edu/groups/ctl/

    Just an idea…

    #49877

    jean amaral
    Participant

    I identified BMCC authors with a site search:

    “borough of manhattan community college” site:omicsonline.org

    Imperfect, but gives a sense of what’s there.

    #49878

    Beth Evans
    Participant

    Thanks, Jean.

    #49888

    Monica Berger
    Participant

    Ah. I just checked City Tech. Glad to say no one/nothing came up.

    #49892

    Jill Cirasella
    Participant

    Here are two helpful pages:
    http://www.omicsonline.org/universities/The_City_University_of_New_York/
    http://www.omicsonline.org/universities/City_University_of_New_York/

    They lists all CUNY people who contributed to OMICS journals, proceedings, or conferences. All who included “The City University of New York” or “City University of New York” in their affiliations, anyway. (Given how many ways there are to write CUNY affiliations, there could be more not included here.)

    The combined counts on these pages (but understanding that there could be overlap, and some things might be double-counted):

    Editors, Contributors and Speakers: 39 + 57 = 96
    Publications: 27 + 11 = 38
    Proceedings: 24 + 18 = 42

    (I see that some people authored for them multiple times.)

    Has anyone decided whether to contact contributors individually? (I haven’t made up my mind yet.) If you do, will you share the email you send them? I imagine it’d be a delicate message to craft!

    Jill

    #49903

    Monica Berger
    Participant

    Oh, oh. Found some colleagues. Thanks for giving these details Jill.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

css.php
Need help with the Commons? Visit our
help page
Send us a message